Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's Controversial Marijuana Tax

In Michigan, a pivotal cannabis policy debate is brewing, focusing on the introduction of a 24% wholesale marijuana tax which is facing constitutional scrutiny. This case is capturing national interest, not only for its influence on cannabis pricing but also for its implications on voter-endorsed legislation and tax policies nationwide.

For everyone—from cannabis users to those residing far from Michigan—this legal battle holds significance. This ruling could potentially dictate how other states formulate, alter, and justify cannabis taxes, demonstrating a potential forecast of future legal encounters as the industry expands.

Here's what every American should comprehend regarding this matter.

Image 1

Defining Michigan's Proposal

Included in the 2025–2026 fiscal plan, Michigan legislators approved a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis aimed at generating funds for road infrastructure enhancements. This levy is positioned earlier in the supply chain, affecting transactions before products appear on dispensary shelves.

Michigan’s current tax structure already includes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis transactions (approved by voters in 2018)

  • A 6% state sales tax. Introducing the new wholesale tax could position Michigan among the states with the most complicated and highest cannabis tax frameworks.

Industry’s Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends that the tax is unconstitutional. Their argument is fundamentally based on:

The requirement for a supermajority vote to alter the 2018 voter-approved marijuana law.

When voters legalized recreational cannabis through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), it provided legal safeguards to the statute. Such amendments necessitate a three-fourths supermajority.

However, the wholesale tax was enacted with only a simple majority.

MCIA's spokesperson Rose Tantraphol emphasized their stance as reported by Michigan Advance:

“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Schedule Your Estate & Gift Consultation
Our team specializes in estate, gift, valuation, and forensic accounting matters. Book a confidential consultation to discuss your needs and get clear, actionable strategies.
Book a Consultation

State's Defense

Michigan’s legal defense asserts the tax’s legitimacy by stating:

  • The wholesale tax is distinct, not a revision of the 2018 voter-approved cannabis statute.

  • Legislative authority grants the power to establish new taxes for budgetary needs.

  • The primary goal is road infrastructure funding, not amending cannabis policies.

If upheld by the courts, this tax could commence on January 1, 2026.

Image 2

Potential Impacts on Consumers

This case’s outcome is pivotal, even for those residing outside Michigan, as states often model cannabis tax systems on one another. Should the tax remain intact:

  • Wholesale prices will potentially rise.

  • To balance costs, retail prices may elevate.

  • Some consumers might resort to less expensive unregulated markets.

  • Smaller enterprises could face economic pressures or mergers.

Should the tax be nullified, Michigan's extant tax configuration—already lauded as economically favorable—remains in place.

National Significance

While this lawsuit transpires within Michigan, its consequences extend beyond state lines.

1. Testing Voter-Approved Law Limits: Permitting tax addition without supermajority approval might transform operational paradigms of ballot initiatives across states.

2. Influencing Cannabis Tax Schemes Elsewhere: States grappling with budget-constricted infrastructure could emulate Michigan’s strategy if successful.

3. Underlying Disparate Cannabis Tax Rates Nationally: Despite Michigan and Oregon offering budget-conscious cannabis taxes, other states, such as California, grapple with illicit market exuberance fueled by excessive taxes.

This Michigan lawsuit could forge a framework for tax challenge dialogue across other states.

Future Developments

Following deliberations, a decision by the Michigan Court of Claims is imminent, with a propensity for escalation to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Irrespective of the resolution, the ruling will dramatically inform legislative entities on managing voter-confirmed statutes, nascent industries, and fiscal authority.

Schedule Your Estate & Gift Consultation
Our team specializes in estate, gift, valuation, and forensic accounting matters. Book a confidential consultation to discuss your needs and get clear, actionable strategies.
Book a Consultation
Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .